Text Analysis for me Too

TAToo is an embeddable text analysis widget which allows basic page analytics to be easily integrated alongside the text that it analyzes.
The tool, spawned from the mind of Geoffrey Rockwell and begun as a side project during my work with him, is APACHE licensed and includes a basic wordpress plugin.
Feature requests and bug reports are appreciated.
Smartphone Feature Hacking
I’m always impressed with the cleverness of hacks that repurpose a tool for a use completely foreign to its original function. Things like fluffing your pillows with tennis balls in the dryer or keeping moisture from brown sugar by adding grains of rice. One particularly neat area of late is in mobile devices. With smartphones piling on all sorts of trinkets and sensors, people are finding subversive uses for them. Here’s a few that I’ve been amused and impressed by:
Instant Heart Rate (Android): We can all recognize the bright red orb of a finger placed over a camera lens. This app uses that for practical purposes: a user holds their finger over the lens and it tracks their heart rate through changes in color. Neat!
On the Motivations of Crowds
A few days ago, I successfully defending my MA thesis on crowd motivation. As I polish up a final copy for print, here is my draft. Details forthcoming.
Why Bother? Examining the Motivations of Users in Large-Scale Crowd-Powered Online Initiatives
As this is not the final copy, please do not distribute it. Rather, link back to this page, so that I can provide the final when available.
Incidents at Stanley Milner Library
A reworking of Mack D. Male’s graphic.

Fun with Advertising on Empire Avenue
Recently I’ve been participated in Empire Avenue, an online person stock exchange, where users buy shares in each other.
One feature that has caused me much amusement is the advertising. Using the game’s virtual money, one can buy an ad and make the case for their stock. I’d previously concentrated more on my investments rather than my own shares, but yesterday I decided to have some fun with some increasingly odd ads. Here are the results of my little experiment.
My ticker, by the way, is PORG.
I began by stating facts. I’d jumped over the weekend and was still going up.
![]()
From there, I’m moved to the Head-On approach of repeating a barely coherent statement a couple times.
![]()
Next, I decided to move into chastising users, like online “entrepreneurs” do. Nothings says ‘trust me’ like ‘you’re an idiot for not trusting me’. I approached this with increasingly nonsensical metaphor (What does “breeze of regret even mean, and is it even bad? It was originally “gentle breeze”, but I figured that was too much.)

Note that I had a typo (though I like to imagine it being said with Mario’s faux Italian accent – “THAT’S A-the odor..”), so for the the sake of keeping results fair I reposted it.
Next, I moved into rewriting history.
![]()
Taking a slight detour in tone, this one references the other ads. It doesn’t make sense if mine is at the top, but if it’s under another ad it may offer an amusing juxtaposition.
![]()
Next, suggestions of nefarious dealings.
![]()
Some more of the Head-On approach.
![]()
![]()
And as a final experiment, a comparison between yelling and speaking, with the same statement punctuated differently.

So, how did it turn out? Here are the results:

1 click per 1200 views! Success! Oddly enough, my share prices jumped by another 2 credits overnight, though that was based more on my portfolio.
As impressive as the results are, it did fare worse than my other ad, which gave me 1 per 167 views.
![]()
Note: let me know if you want an invite to the game.
Stack Overflow
Everyone has their own stories, no? The time that Wikipedia made you understand something a textbook couldn’t,
Stack Overflow is a programming help site. The site is heavily controlled by its community; as users gain points and achievements for contributing to the site, they gain more administrative power.
I’ll admit, I went through a period where I watched the questions page daily, looking for something I could answer. However, I found that every single time, somebody gave a better answer much quicker. I’m sure it is eventually discouraging, but in my experience it made me competitive. If you don’t get the first answer, at least get a higher rated response. Programming is an endless process of puzzles and problem-solving, so it’s good to know that there’s a place where one in need can get help within minutes. As Jeff Atwood notes in the tweet above, it’s quality help too.
Clay Shirky has a wonderful talk about this phenomenon, wherein he argues that passion (or ‘love’) is a resource that is unfairly underestimated. He uses the example of support for the open-source programming language perl: in an absence of commercial support, there are more than enough passionate perl users online to fill the need. Watch it below.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe1TZaElTAs]




